Monday, September 06, 2010

Interview with Elissa Down (writer-director of The Black Balloon) - June 25th, 2008

Promoting: The Black Balloon
Venue: The Traverse, Edinburgh Film Festival
Interview type: One-on-one



Note: Actually, I accidentally deleted the interview I did at the time, but Elissa very kindly agreed to an email interview at a later date, so this is that interview instead.

ViewLondon (VL): This is obviously a very personal film for you. How
much of it is autobiographical?

Elissa Down (ED): I have 3 brothers, 2 of which have autism. I also
had a father in the army so we had to move around quite a bit. Most of the stuff in the film happened to me, we just used the incidents as inspiration, and shaped it into a dramatic structure.

VL: How have your family reacted to the film?

ED: My family are really proud. Dad loves it because he thinks he's
funny now - he's heard audiences laughing at his jokes! Mum has cried
everytime she has seen it. And my middle brother sighed and asked why he didn't have a girlfriend like Gemma at highschool, ha ha.

VL: Can you say a little about the casting of Luke and Rhys? How did
you find them?

ED: The casting of the two brothers was really easy. Luke was the 2nd
guy to come in for Charlie and I knew within 10 secs that this is the
actor for Charlie. Rhys came in on his day off (from the show "Home
and Away") and I think in so many ways he was just like Thomas. When we put both Luke and Rhys together they had this instant connection as brothers.

VL: Luke Ford gives an incredible performance (as autistic teenager
Charlie). How much direction did you give Luke with his performance?
Was there a long rehearsal period? Did he spend time with autistic
children?

ED: Luke had a 6month rehearsal period. He walked around the streets of Sydney with his knees strapped so he could develop the physical stiffness of Charlie. He spent time with my brother to get a lot of the specific mannerisms. He would record himself eating, on the computer, walking, running and we would watch it together. I would then give him any notes etc.

VL: How did Gemma Ward get involved? Isn't she a supermodel or something?

ED: Gemma and I worked together on a short film of mine "Pink Pyjamas" when she was 13. She was this lanky girl that wanted to run away and go to NIDA when she was 18. The fashion world discovered her and this modelling career just exploded for her.

VL: How similar is your father to Erik Thomson's character? Does he
really take advice from stuffed animals?

ED: Yes, my parents have many stuffed bears in the house. There are 3 actually that are in their bedroom, one being Rex. There have been some funny conversations with them over the years.

VL: At what stage did Toni Collette get involved and what was your
reaction when she agreed to take the part?

ED: Toni got involved when the script was finished. It was sent to her
and within a week we got a 'yes'. My producer rang me with the news
and I was doing this clifftop walk around Bondi. I couldn't believe
it! I was so excited and just swearing off my head, going "No, no, I
can't believe it' I think people around me thought I was getting bad
news. I had to then run home and I called everyone (and made them
swear not to tell anyone, ha ha).

VL: There's a fight scene towards the end of the film that is
brilliantly choreographed and looks very complicated. Was it difficult
to film and how long did it take to rehearse? (It felt incredibly
realistic and really captured the chaos of a fight breaking out).

ED: We filmed that scene over a day. We broke it up and shot it
sequentially. We had a number of rehearsals for it and the lounge-room furniture was selected with that sequence in mind (eg padded big lounge, round coffee table etc). We rehearsed it a few times and our stunt co-ordinator Lawrence Woodward (who also worked on the Matrix which I think is hilarious. He goes from that to crafting scenes over a tampon!) help choreograph how to make the fighting look real but be safe for the actors.

VL: How have autistic groups reacted to the film?

ED: It has had such a fantastic response and it is being used as a
training video because they feel it captures the chaos and issues of
families living with a member with autism. Also, families have felt
that someone has told their story of what it is like to live day to
day with this: all the struggles, joys and frustrations.

VL: Are you working on anything else? What's your next film going to be?

ED: I'm working on a number of projects, two being "Savage Garden" and "The Boy in the Sky" but you never know which one will be up next. It's like a horse race, you don't know who is going to come in first.

Labels: , , ,

Interview with Richard Jenkins - June 21st, 2008

Promoting: The Visitor
Venue: The Delegate Centre, Edinburgh Film Festival
Interview type: One-on-one



Question (Q): How did you get involved in the film, first of all?

Richard Jenkins (RJ): Tom and I were acquaintances, we didn't know each other well. And I ran into him in a hotel in L.A. and he invited me to dinner, so we went out for dinner, we talked for two hours and got to know each other a little bit. And then, about a year and a half later he called and said, “I wrote this part for you. I had your voice in my head when I wrote it and I want you to read it and tell me if you want to do it.” So I read it and flipped and I said, “Yeah, but nobody's going to give you any money to do it if I'm playing the lead.” He said, “That wasn't my question, my question was do you want to do it – let me worry about the money”. So I said, “Yeah, I do. More than you know.”

Q: It must be pretty amazing when a director writes a part like that with you in mind?

RJ: It was a gift for me, it wasn't something I was expecting or thought that I'd ever do, you know, and here it is. And he asked me to come look at the rough cut of the movie after we shot it and I said, “Tom, I don't want to see it, I don't want to watch myself”. He said, “No, I need you to see this, I want you to see this.” So my wife and I went to New York and sat in a little screen and saw a rough cut and he came in and said, “Well?” And I'm not the most articulate person in the world, but I remember saying, “I've waited my entire professional life to be involved in a project like this.” That's what I think of it. It was a gift.

Q: Tell me about the drumming – did you have to learn the drums for the role?

RJ: I played the drums when I was younger, I played for about five, six years. But I wasn't very good, so I quit, because I wasn't getting any better. But it did help me get into the film. But I didn't practice at all (laughs).

Q: So the drumming was in the script? Tom didn't know you played the drums and was expecting you to learn them?

RJ: Yeah, that's right. Well, it was a pretty simple beat. I could play with speed – I was always a pretty quick drummer, but I used to get lost a lot. I could never get out of my head – it's like what Tarek says, 'Stop thinking, Walter!' I could never stop thinking when I played the drums. But what I did get out of those five years was I was fairly quick and I know he wanted it to be emotional and full of freedom, anger, you know, release, everything.

Q: Tell me about Tom, how was he as a director?

RJ: Oh, he's fantastic. He's incredibly collaborative - really smart, really articulate. He can talk about what his movie is as well as anybody I've ever worked for. And then you get that vision, you start to see where he's going with it, so it's incredibly helpful. And he's an actor himself, so that's very helpful – he treats you the way he likes to be treated as an actor. And he's collaborative, he'll let you do anything, but he also has a sense of what the movie is and if he doesn't think what you're doing is working, he'll let you know. But you never felt like you couldn't screw up. And even though we didn't have a big shooting schedule – it was 28 days – I never felt hurried or rushed. If I was going to do a big role like this, I couldn't have asked for better circumstances to do it in.

Q: Do you have a favourite scene in the film?

RJ: I liked the drum lesson a lot. I like that scene. And I like the scene in the restaurant, when I confess that I don't do anything.

Labels: , , ,

Interview with Thomas McCarthy (writer-director of The Visitor) - June 21st, 2008

Promoting: The Visitor
Venue: The Delegate Centre, Edinburgh Film Festival
Interview type: One-on-one



Q: I love the film, first of all. Tell me how the idea came about.

Thomas McCarthy (TM): The real jumping-off point was Richard's character. Having a guy like this who might have some kind of arbitrary but life-changing adventure in New York. And then thinking about that a lot and about stories where people sort of drop in and out of their lives and how that affects them. And I'm always looking for new characters so I started to come up with the character of Tarek based on some travels and spending some time in Beirut. And I thought wow, what if I show this Arab guy who's like an artist and he's got enthusiasm for life, I haven't seen this representation before, it would be fun to bring him into contact with this Walter Vale guy I'm thinking of. And then it was like, what baggage do they bring, what reality do they bring and Tarek's reality turned out to be the immigration angle.

Q: So you wrote the script for Richard? Was that based on anything in particular?

TM: Generally, but then, as fate would have it, a friend of mine – Bobby Carnevale from The Station Agent – was in this bad remake of this movie Shall We Dance. I went and saw it with Bobby and Richard had a scene near the end of the movie with Susan Sarandon, in the bar, where he's basically saying they're not up to anything and you've got to let it go. But there was such heat between them. And I called [our agent] afterwards and said “I just saw Richard in that movie and he was so good, it's like a seduction scene” and she said, “It's so funny that you say that, because I just had Richard on the phone and he said, 'I think I've just got to go for it and play that scene like I'm in love with her, because there's nothing else there in the script, it's just a boring expositional scene'”. And I was like, “Wow, that guy could be a leading man, he's got the voice and the soulful eyes, he's like Gene Hackman in a way, kind of ugly, kind of handsome...” and I like that.

Q: Richard said that he thought you'd never get the financing if he was involved, so how did you sort that out?

TM: I felt like I had enough Station Agent capital saved to get someone to bite. I sat down with my agent, my lawyer and my producer and we put together a short list of three companies that we thought were right. And two of them right away were like, okay.

Q: And finally, you're in the fifth season of The Wire? What can you tell us about that?

TM: I play Scott Templeton, a reporter for the Baltimore Sun. This season examines the influence of the press, specifically newspapers and specifically The Baltimore Sun where David Simon worked for something like 15 years as a reporter, so it's a storyline that's very near and dear to his heart. And it is a really interesting examination of what's happening in the industry, about how the press creates its own press sometimes and it's a fun little journey.

Q: So how did you get involved?

TM: David Simon just called me. I think I read for a part early early on, when they were putting the show together. I don't remember what part or what happened to it, but I'm pretty sure it wasn't Bunk and I'm pretty sure it wasn't Snoop. Or maybe it was and maybe that's why I didn't get it! He called me when we were editing The Visitor and he said 'I have a part for you' and I was like, “Oh God, the worst timing ever, it's such a consuming process” but I couldn't pass it up and I grabbed it and I'm super-happy I did.

Labels: , , ,

Sunday, August 22, 2010

Interview with Noel Clarke (writer, director and star of Adulthood) - June 11th, 2008

Promoting: Adulthood
Venue: Soho Hotel
Interview type: Round table


ViewLondon (VL): Writer, actor, now director – what was that like for you?

Noel Clarke (NC): Yeah, it was a lot of fun. It was obviously a challenge, but I'd been acting for a few years and writing for about half of that time as well and so when the film company asked me to direct, it wasn't something that I wanted to miss. So I had to do a test shoot, which was shoot a few scenes from the film, so they could approve that, so I did that and they passed it and then I got to do the feature.

VL: Will you concentrate more on acting, writing or directing now, do you think?

NC: Well, I'm hoping – I know there's a real thing in this country where they like to shove you into a box but I'm allowed to do all three because essentially, that's what I do. I remember when Kidulthood came out, people were like, 'Do you write now? Is that what you do?' and I was like, 'Well, no, I still act as well', so if I'm allowed to, I'd like to still be able to do all three. Although not always at the same time.


VL: What have you got coming up?

NC: I'm doing a film with Jim Sturgess called Heartless, which is directed by Philip Ridley and that's just as an actor. And it's great to be able to sit on set and look at the director stressing and be like, 'Ah, yeah', you know, 'cos I've done it. And obviously I'd just like to continue my writing and hopefully to be able to direct more stuff as well.

VL: The role of Sam is very different in this film to the last one. How did you set about transforming him from the villain into the hero or anti-hero?

NC: Well, obviously he's the same character and in the first film he was more like a one-dimensional bully and was there to serve a purpose. And in this film, obviously he's learned a valuable lesson and has to come out and deal with the consequences of his actions. But you know, it had to be his character because he had the biggest journey to go on. Because what a lot of young people that do these things don't realise, it's not just about you, it's about your victims and about how they feel. And I think that people aren't necessarily afraid of prison, you know, and I wanted to show that you go in there, there's people that really do really horrible things and if you're young like Sam was, you know, and you realise, actually, I was just a guy that thought I was some kind of big-shot but actually you go in there and there's really horrible people, you become humble very quickly. And you either go one of two ways, you either are sorry and you come out and you change or it can make you worse. And I wanted to show a character that is actually truly sorry when he comes out and wants to change his life. But I didn't want to make it too easy - in fact, he didn't come out saying sorry, he just wanted to be left alone. [SPOILERS] But then throughout the day, he's realising what he's done and who he's hurt, so when he says sorry at the end, he's earned it and you know that he truly means it.

VL: When you finished writing the first film, did you always have an idea of how you thought the character's life would go after the film had finished?

NC: No, I didn't. There wasn't even going to be a second film, it wasn't something I was interested in doing. I was back filming series 2 of Doctor Who at the time and it wasn't something I was thinking about. But then one of the actresses got a bit excited and she was telling people there was going to be a second one and she was going to do this and she was going to do that and I was like, 'This girl's mad', but then I thought, 'Actually, if I was going to do a second one, what would I do?' And I thought it would have to be that character and supported by Jay as well, that character, because he was friends with Trife and what would happen to you if your friend got killed like that, what would it turn you into? [SPOILERS] And I think throughout this film you see Jay as almost one-dimensional like Sam was but then at the end he says, 'I'm here because of you', you know, 'You did this, if it wasn't for you I wouldn't be like this'. And you think 'Oh wow', that's what happened, it becomes like a vicious circle, people do things and then other people want to get them back and at some point somebody has to walk away or it never ends. Or it does end when someone dies.

VL: He was such a bad character in the first film - were you worried that it would be difficult for audiences to be sympathetic towards him in this one?

NC: Yeah, yeah, completely. I can see that. But even at the end, if they're not sympathetic, I don't necessarily mind. You can't always be forgiven by everyone if you do something as deplorable as he'd done. But if you're truly sorry within yourself, I think that's what counts. Not everyone's going to forgive you, but you don't always deserve to be forgiven. But what counts is if you've done something and you've learned from that mistake and you are not going to do it again and you are truly sorry and you've changed your life and become a better person and it's one less person doing wrong on the streets, I think that's what matters. So if people come out and they're like, 'Well, I still don't like the character', that's fine, as long as they can see that the message is there, that you can be an individual and walk away and not participate in continuing the circle of violence.

VL: Why do you think Kidulthood was so popular?

NC: I think it's just the air of authenticity because other films have come out that have tried to do the same thing and they've dropped like a lead safe. And I think the reason Kidulthood has been so popular is the authenticity, I think people can tell. If it's written by people that know or people that actually care, I think the audience can tell and I think that's what happened. Because, I mean, apart from Bridget Jones, Mr Bean or 28 Days Later, I defy you to tell me any British sequels made in this country. [No answer]. Right? And the reason we got a sequel is because the audience spoke. They went to see the film because their generation was captured by the movie and they went to see it. Sequels just don't happen in this country, for British films. And I think it is the authenticity, it's the fact that they related to it. A lot of adults and journalists were saying, 'This doesn't happen, this is ridiculous, kids don't have sex at fifteen, this is outrageous' and all the kids were like, 'We do this, man!'

VL: What about the accusations that Kidulthood glamorised and promoted violence?

NC: In real life, if you get hit with a baseball bat, you might die. That's what happens in real life. In other movies, you get thrown through a window, you get rolled over by a car and you get up and you fall through a pool table, that's glamorising violence to me. Because it's making it unrealistic, it's telling you these things can happen to you and you'll be fine, but in real life, you get hit once, just get hit wrong with the wrong thing and you might die. And it wasn't glamorising, it was just reflecting what society was doing and I think, unfortunately the film was right.

VL: Kids are always in the news – only yesterday there was talk of how kids are demonised and thrown in prison and so on. What can people do to tackle young crime and why are those perceptions out there?

NC: I don't know what people can do to tackle young crime. I'm not a journalist or a politician or someone who thinks they know the answer to that. All I can do is what I do and what I do is make films that raise questions. But if you want to look at anyone who's helping young people then you can look at this film because we set up a music initiative for young people to send their music in and young people sent their music in. We had 800, 900 tracks being sent in by young people who were making music in their bedrooms. And the hook was, 'Do something positive, make some music and if you get picked, your tracks will be in the film'. And their tracks are in the film. If you give young people positive things to do, they will do positive things. We literally scanned everywhere looking for new and young people. We let people from MySpace who liked the film come and be extras and got them excited about being on a film set. Again, if you give young people positive things to do, they will do positive things.

I can't answer why their behaviour is the way it is, but I can say that in the area I grew up in, there used to be a thing called YCTV, which was Youth Television, and it got young people into directing and acting and stuff like that. There's a director I know called Luke Hyams, he does Dubplate Drama, he came from YCTV. And all it was, local kids or kids who were behaving a bit bad could go there and learn about the industry and last year they closed it down. Why have they closed it down? Because now, all those kids who could go there and learn, what are they going to do now?
And with the amount of money that's floating around, you can't say it's because of funding. I have no idea why they closed it down, but if anyone could find out, I would love to know why they closed down YCTV, because the kids in that area need something like that.

VL: Do you have a favourite scene that you either wrote, acted or directed?

NC: I think one of my favourite scenes is when Ben Drew and Arnold Ocseng (Dabs and Henry) go into the basement flat and the other boys are playing the computer game and they kind of just sort of take it over. It doesn't move the story forward, it's not essentially really aggressive, it's just like teenage boys, you know, 'We're in here, we're more important than you, give us the controllers' kind of thing. And then the continuation scene from that, when they're playing the computer games, because sometimes young people are demonised and stuff like that – it's a very small minority but the stuff they do is so awful it grabs the news – but we forget that they're kids and sometimes they just want to play computer games and sit down and have fun. And I like that scene because for a moment they're young boys again. Which is what I think some of them would really like to be if they thought they had a choice.

VL: What do you want young people to get out of the film when you see it?

NC: I want them to realise that if you give them positive things to do, they'll do positive things. Yes, some young people are demonised and some of them are quite rightly demonised, but on the flipside, you have a lot of good young people that are doing things and some of them really grab the opportunities to make music and stuff like that. But also, I want people to look at the bigger picture of the film and see that the message is there for the characters to not be afraid to be individuals. [SPOILERS] You know, Henry doesn't want to be involved. Dabs hits him with a brick, but it's because Henry doesn't want to be involved. For every Dabs, you have a Henry, for every Jay, you have a Mooney, who wants to study at university, you know, for every Jay at the end you have a Sam who's going to go, 'You know what? I'm walking away'.

And I think young people need to not be afraid to be an individual. If all your friends want to play football and you want to write poems, write your poems! Sit on the football pitch and write a poem about them playing football if you need to, but don't be scared to do it, you know, don't be scared to be your own person.

And also, at the same time, for those slightly negative young people that always have excuses – and I've heard a lot of them say, you know, 'Who knows about what I go through? I grew up with a single mother on a council estate. You can't tell me anything, you don't know'. I do know. I was raised on a council estate, by a single mother and I'm making films. So now that excuse is not eligible anymore, you need to look at yourself and sort out your life, you know? A lot of them are quite rightly demonised but some just make excuses. Don't make excuses. Stop whatever you're doing that's negative, because you can't use that excuse, and find something positive to do. And I hope that's something that people take away.

VL: You've written about something that's very close to you. I would imagine you'll now get lots of people sending you their scripts for you to direct. Is that something you'd consider?

NC: Yeah, most definitely, I'd direct anything. You could send me the next Care Bears movie, I'd do that, if it was good enough. I wouldn't like to be pigeon-holed as 'He does this sort of work'. The films I've done just happen to be the films I've done because that's what I've been allowed to do. But I'd be more than happy to write and create other stuff. Also, to be quite honest – and I know some people might be annoyed at this – we've written about this genre and we've got a sequel, so anyone who's at home going 'I'm gonna write a film about gangs, I'm going to write a film about this', so anyone who's at home writing those films, face facts: you're not going to be as good as these films. You're not going to get a sequel. So you might as well stop that and write about a doctor or a lawyer or think of something new or exciting or different so we can start moving away from this sort of subject and show young people in a more positive light. We have teen films coming out of America every week, which we flock to see and they make millions of pounds, so why are we not doing them over here? They're not difficult to do, you know, they'll get the audience, but we just don't make them. We need to be doing stuff like that. So hopefully, the fact Adulthood has created the history it has by getting the sequel, hopefully now we can just take that audience, the MySpace, Facebook, PSP, Wii, Nintendo, Playstation culture and take them into new directions.

VL: I know you're filming material for the DVD at the moment. Is it important for you for the DVD to be as good as it can be?

NC: Yeah, I think it'll be as good as it can be. We'll have as many features as we can cram on there because that's what people want, they want extra content. We've got music videos for the film – that never happens! The last thing I remember was Love, Actually, with Girls Aloud and Hugh Grant dancing around. We've got music videos with footage from the film. The cast appear in the Sway video – that happens in American films, it doesn't happen here. And the question is why not? Why doesn't it happen with, quotation marks, “urban” films? It's because no-one's given it the chance to happen. And I might look quite dumb, but I've orchestrated all of this because I'm trying to give people opportunities to do new things and let us become more creative. And the soundtrack? My goodness! I don't know if it's your sort of music, but when you hear the soundtrack, you'll be jigging away, seriously. Seriously.

VL: Your films -Kidulthood, Adulthood and West 10- have given an opportunity for a lot of young talent, in particular black actors, to get into feature films. Was there anyone in particular who stood out for you?

NC: Adam Deacon, who plays Jay. I think a lot of people overlook him because he is what he is. You see him and that's him, but he's a very, very talented actor and he's going to be doing good things. And there's a new kid in this film called Jacob Anderson who plays my little brother. He was only 17 when we did the film, I think he's just turned 18 now, but he's a fantastic prospect for the future. And obviously, I set Aml Ameen on his way – a lot of people think he was in The Bill first, but he wasn't, he did Kidulthood first and they saw him and they took him and now he's on his way doing good things. And Shanika (Warren-Markland) and Red (Madrell), the two girls, they're really good talents and I think if they're allowed to, by the industry, all of them could do really, really well. They're fantastic talents and I hope that they're supported and do well in the future.

Labels: , , ,

Interview with Scarlett Alice Johnson (star of Adulthood) - June 11th, 2008

Promoting: Adulthood
Venue: Soho Hotel
Interview type: Round table


ViewLondon (VL): Sorry to mention EastEnders immediately. You had quite a tough time on EastEnders, from the critics. This is a completely different role - do you hope that it will blow the critics away?

Scarlett Alice Johnson (SJ): God, that is quite a tough start! No, this is utterly different, in every way. I've always said that I'd rather have a reaction rather than no reaction to every character I play, so I make a conscious effort not to pick very generic characters. Nine times out of ten you get passed on scripts where it's just like the daughter or the wife, especially as a female actor, obviously, that can be really frustrating.

The thing that I love about this character and about this film is that it's completely specific. It's a very specific subculture, it's a very specific language, she has a very specific physicality, everything. It's just so far from being generic. Which is great, it's such a good tool as an actor to really narrow down the person you're playing.

VL: Talking of accents, it seemed to me that you, or rather the character modified her accent depending on who she was talking to. Was that right?

SJ: Yes. It's more of a colloquialism rather than an accent, so obviously she's aware of what she's doing. So when she's speaking to someone, she'll slightly vary her speech, so she'll speak differently to her boss than she will to, say, her dealer. But I'm glad you picked up on that!

VL: Was that something that came from you or from Noel's direction?

SJ: No, that was written in the script. The words in the script really dictated how I was going to say them and that was there right from the start.

VL: Were you a big fan of the first film? And was it daunting to come in and play against the character who had dominated the first movie?

SJ: I was very aware of Kidulthood, I'd actually bought the DVD. I'd also met Noel about three years before the first audition, so I wasn't particularly nervous coming into join it, because it was a nice thing to come into the second instalment of one big story.

VL: Do you have a favourite scene in the film?

SJ: That's quite hard. I think, in the beginning of the film, there's a scene where Lexi first meets Sam and they're just talking and she's got her back up completely. She's at her most abrasive because I think she's quite insecure and quite nervous and she doesn't quite know how to react to him, she probably fancies him a little bit, but in that scene she's Lexi at her most raw, her most Lexi-ish, if you like. And she has some great one-liners, she's got such a dark sense of humour. And there's one line that I can't repeat as it's slightly rude, but that just made me crack up. So that's my favourite scene, not in terms of the filming but in terms of the script, I just think it's brilliant.

VL: You have, not a sex scene, but a bit of hanky-panky in the film – how was that to film?

SJ: Ha ha! Everyone phrases it in different ways. Hanky-panky, intimacy, love. It was fine. Obviously, Noel has been with this project from start to finish so I felt very confident that I was never going to arrive on set and things had changed, I would suddenly be topless or wearing, I don't know, something on my nipples. I knew what it was going to entail. I've always felt very strongly that I would never do any kind of sex scene, or any kind of nude scene, in fact, unless it was absolutely necessary in the script. And this is not a gratuitous sex scene anyway, I think it's quite an honest portrayal of that slightly awkward, initial fumbling sort of thing. I'm very pleased with it.

Note: I've posted interview notes in the comments section below.

Labels: , , , ,

Interview with Nadine Labaki (writer, director and star of Caramel) - October 26th, 2007

Promoting: Caramel
Venue: Sofitel Hotel
Interview type: One-on-one


ViewLondon (VL): So far, Caramel has been shown in France, Switzerland, Lebanon, Toronto, Dubai and Spain. What's the reaction to the film been like so far?

Nadine Labaki (NL): It's been amazing, everywhere we go. It's amazing how, even though the culture is different, people are reacting very warmly – it's a very warm feeling overall, it's a very positive reaction. People feel connected to this film, connected to the characters. They identify with them, they identify with the situations.

VL: I was amazed to read that the cast were all non-professional actors. Can you say a little about that?

NL: Yes, it's the first time they've acted. I wanted to use non-actors because I wanted to give the audience the impression that they were spying on other people's lives, not that they were watching a fiction with actors that were pretending to be someone else. I just wanted them to be who they were in life, to be the same in the film. So I didn't ask them to act, I just asked them to be. But the casting took a long time, it took over a year.

VL: It was your first film as a writer-director, so how difficult a decision was it for you to act in the film as well?

NL: It came when I started working on the casting and when I started auditioning the other parts. When I was playing Layale with them and I was with them in the scenes, it would create a very strong bond between us and it would just make the best come out of them. Because I was with them in the scene I could really direct it the way I wanted it and they would react to whatever I was saying. And it created something really strong, so that gave me the strength and the courage to say, yeah, I can do it. Even though it wasn't going to be easy, I decided to go along with it, because it really created something very special. And this friendship that happens in the film is a real friendship, you know, it's not fake. We really are all friends now. So it was not an easy adventure, but I'm happy with the result.

VL: The film reminded me a lot of Pedro Almodovar's films. Was he a particular influence?

NL: I absolutely love his films but he has a fantasy world where his situations are unreal or they're the result of his imagination or fantasies, whereas in my film it's based on reality and true things. But I think there's a similarity in that we both talk about women in a very loving way and I adore his films. Actually, the character of Gisele is a very Almodovarian character but it wasn't deliberate, although I take it as a compliment.

VL: Are there any other directors you admire?

NL: I love Lars Von Trier, the Coen Brothers, Woody Allen and an Iraqi director called Bahman Ghobadi.

VL: Do you know what your next film will be?

NL: No, I have many themes that I'd like to explore but I don't know yet. I'm still not obsessed with one. I need to be obsessed with something before I write about it, because I want it to be as true as possible. So I'm just waiting to see what will happen next.

Note: I've posted interview notes in the comments section below.

Labels: , , ,

Interview with Roxane Mesquida - October 24th, 2007

Promoting: The Last Mistress
Venue: Sofitel Hotel
Interview type: One-on-one



ViewLondon (VL): Obviously you've worked with Catherine Breillat before (in A Ma Soeur and Sex Is Comedy). Were you always going to play the character that you play? Was it written for you?

Roxane Mesquida (RM): Well, no. Not really. I didn't know that I was going to play this character. We really want to work together all the time but this character is only 16 so she was scared that I was maybe too old for the role (I'm 26). She needed a big difference between (co-star) Asia Argento and the girl playing Hermangard. So she had these doubts about me for the role and one day we went to a retrospective of her movies and there was a screening of A Ma Soeur and Sex is Comedy, so we saw them together and she looked at me and said, “Oh my God, you're exactly the same! You haven't changed!” And at this moment, she realised it was completely possible for me to play a 16-year-old girl. Well, I'm always 16, in all the movies I make! And it's really funny because it's the third time I play a virgin in her movies – I've started to specialise in losing my virginity on screen.

VL: What was your favourite scene to film?

RM: My favourite scene was when I cried on the cliffside. It was really cool, because it was really hard. I had to run upstairs like maybe 20 times, it was really high and every time Catherine said, “No. You smiled a little. Go back.” I didn't smile! I almost passed out, I was like, “Please Catherine, I promise, I didn't smile...”. And so I cried for real.

VL: You don't have many scenes with Asia Argento. Did you get to know her at all?

RM: I have only one scene with her and the really interesting thing is that Catherine asked me to never speak with her. And I never spoke to her on the set, so I don't know her at all. And when I saw the movie for the first time, I realised why Catherine asked me to do that. So, in this scene with Asia, where I'm looking at her, you can see in my eyes that I really don't know her and I'm asking myself questions about her.

VL: What was it like working with (male lead) Fu'ad Ait Aattou?

RM: He's a model and it was his first role. It was really interesting. I really love acting with actors who've never acted before because there is something fresh and spontaneous about them. And Catherine is so good at directing actors – even if you're not an actor, you can only be good in her movies.



Note: I've posted interview notes in the comments section below.

Labels: , , , ,

Interview with David Proud and Sasha Hardway - August 24th, 2007

Promoting: Special People
Venue: Delegate Centre, Edinburgh Film Festival
Interview type: One-on-two



ViewLondon (VL): How did you get into acting and how did you get involved in the film?

David Proud (DP): I was in a TV series called Desperados on CBBC and that was my first big break. From that I managed to get an agent and did a documentary on BBC Three and went straight from that to Special People. I wasn't in the short film version that was filmed in 2005, I just joined it for the feature. But I'm really glad to have done it. It was certainly fun filming it and it's been brilliant coming to Edinburgh and promoting it.

SH: I found an agent who handled actors and models with disabilities, so I joined her agency. I'd got a few jobs from her before – I did a Stephen Poliakoff film, which was quite a big BBC budget film at the time. It was called Friends & Crocodiles – I got carried by Damian Lewis. But this is the biggest film I've been in so far, like, with the most lines. And I was in an article in the Big Issue about disabled actors and that's how Justin (the director) found me.

VL: Tell us a bit more about the short film. How did that come about?

DP: Well, the whole idea is based around [co-star Robyn Frampton], because she wrote a complaint letter to her council and said there's not enough access and something about TV shows. And they got in contact with 104 Films (the production company owned by the director and producer). So without Robyn venting, it probably wouldn't have come off. It was a good mix of her venting and Justin and Dominic getting together and writing a script about it.

VL: How important to both of you is the idea of presenting disabled characters in films and on TV?

DP: We are starting to see more films and TV shows that explore disabled issues, but I'd really like to get to the point where the wheelchair isn't relevant to the character. A guy from Desperados is in a children's show called My Spy Family and his wheelchair is purposely not mentioned – he gets picked on because he wears glasses, not because he's in a chair. So there's no reference to it and that made me smile quite a bit, because he's just a regular character. So you've got to show people in the industry that it can be done and then get people into just regular roles.

VL: So do your agents lobby for that particular sort of thing?

DP: My agent is brilliant. She puts me forward for anything in my age range. She does keep a keen eye out for projects looking for disabled artists, because that's obviously my niche, but if there's a part in my age range, she'll put me forward for it.

VL: And Sasha, you're a model as well. Are you happy to continue modelling and acting or do you feel more pull towards one than the other?

SH: I'm happy doing both, but I think I'm more drawn towards acting.

VL: Have either of you got any other projects coming up?

DP: For me, I've got a project in development with 104 Films that we're trying to get funding for. It's a short film that I wrote with Jason Maza (Dave in Special People). I've seen quite a few different scripts and it's encouraged me to get my own ideas down.

SH: And for me, I'd like to, so if there are any acting parts about...! And in the meantime, I'm modelling. They tried to get the fashion show into London Fashion Week but they failed. Because it's all based on disabled models doing the catwalk and the clothes range is specifically designed for people in wheelchairs. The website is www.wheeliechix-chic.com. So I've been doing some modelling, but I really want to do some more acting.

Labels: , , ,

Interview with Olga Kurylenko - August 24th, 2007

Promoting: The Serpent
Venue: Apex Hotel, Edinburgh
Interview type: One-on-one


ViewLondon (VL): How did you get involved with The Serpent?

Olga Kurylenko (OK): Eric (the director) was looking for a girl…well, I don’t want to say…

VL: I think I can guess. The script calls for an incredibly beautiful girl, right?

OK: (laughs) Yeah and he tried a few models, I guess and it didn’t work out and then he met me and it was good.

VL: Your character is essentially the bait, isn’t she?

OK: Yes, but mainly I’m the victim because she’s used by Plender. She has no papers, so basically she’s illegal in France and you can imagine that he probably took her passport and makes her do all these things because she has nowhere to go. But that’s what attracted me to the part, you know, she’s not a mean person but she does bad things. It’s like a contradiction – she’s a victim but because of her there are many men whose lives get destroyed.

VL: I assume you weren’t shooting for that many days? You’re only in a small handful of scenes compared to the other two.

OK: Well, I did ten days. You know they cut a lot of scenes out.

VL: They cut some of your scenes out? Were there any specific scenes that got cut that you really liked?

OK: Yeah, in the scene where I drug Vincent, there was much more dialogue, but I guess it was too long so they shrank it. And also with Chandras, the lawyer in the beginning, now we only see what she does with him on the video camera, but in the beginning there was more of a seduction, you know, I invited him to my house and so on.

VL: Next to you, my favourite part of The Serpent was the unusual staircase. How was it filming those scenes?

OK: Oh my God, that was terrifying. I was freaking out. I’m scared of heights – I can’t even go out on my balcony and I’m on the fifth floor. So can you imagine, for me, falling down? It was crazy.

VL: You did the whole falling scene yourself?

OK: I did the whole thing myself yes. There was a stunt girl but I did the whole thing myself – I don’t even know why they invited the stunt girl. I wore a harness and I was attached by cables and there was a guy who controlled it all. There was a mat on the floor and it was about ten metres high. So first they dropped me and it was like real speed, you know, real falling and then they slowed it down at the end. But the first moments were real and I was white (with fear). And Eric played a joke on me, because during the shooting, I was really, really scared and he saw that. And at the end, at some point, he said to the guy, “Okay, drop her”. And I got so scared, I screamed like this, ”Aaaaaah!” and he said, “Okay, we got it, that’s the shot”.

VL: We recently saw your Vampire movie, the short film you made with Elijah Wood in Paris, Je T’aime. How was that?

OK: It was amazing, I loved it. It’s the only part I’ve played where I don’t play a human being. The director told me to think of my character as an animal and that was good advice, because it made me change my way of thinking. It’s a pity it was a short and that it couldn’t be developed a bit more. I’d love to do a full-length vampire movie, but a classic one, you know, not a stupid one. Like a fairy tale, with beautiful costumes.

VL: If you’d been asked, would you have been one of Keanu’s vampire brides in Coppola’s Dracula?

OK: Of course I would! Yes! It’s a beautiful movie.

VL: What have you got coming up next?

OK: Well, after The Serpent I did an American film called Hitman – it’s based on a videogame and it’s coming out in October or November. It’s also my first American film.

Note: Interview notes posted in the comments section below.

Labels: , , , ,

Interview with Julie Delpy - June 7th, 2007

Promoting: Two Days In Paris
Venue: Chesterfield Hotel
Interview type: One-on-one


ViewLondon (VL): How difficult was it to put the film together, because obviously you’re doing pretty much everything yourself: writing, directing, editing, composing and acting?

Julie Delpy (JD): Well, it was quite hard to get money from anyone. Luckily the producer believed in the film like crazy and that really made the film happen. Basically every day we had the news that we were getting no money and we ended up with very little to make the film, but even though we didn’t even have enough to finish the film, we shot it and then the producer was able to find a company that lent us money to finish it. But what was great was that no-one was in the film for the money and they all worked their asses off.

VL: You cast a lot of friends and family in the film. Were they encouraged to improvise at all? What kind of direction did you give them?

JD: You know, originally I wanted to improvise quite a lot of the film and then as I met Adam a few times, I realised it wasn’t going the direction I really wanted for the film. And then when I told my parents about the film they said “We don’t want to improvise a word. We’re actors, we need scenes.” So I started writing the film and ended up with 110 pages of screenplay, basically the whole film. There’s a few little chunks that are improvised, but it’s funny because people don’t know, because it seems almost more staged than the other stuff. Just little chunks like the gallery, but not the whole gallery, just little chunks.

VL: Adam Goldberg is fantastic in the film and I gather you wrote the part especially for him. What was it about him that made you want to use him in the film?

JL: Well, he’s the sad clown, kind of thing. It’s like the sadder and more upset he looks, the more people are hitting him on the head, the funnier he looks. And he has great comic timing and I wanted someone who looked funny when they were upset. But he resisted a lot of the comedy stuff – he didn’t want to be jealous, he was like “How could I be jealous of these guys? I mean, look at me…”

VL: The script is excellent. The arguments are very believable, much more so than in any relationship comedy I can really think of.

JD: Well, I’ve argued a lot in my relationships (laughs). And I’ve witnessed a lot of arguments too.

VL: How much of it was drawn from actual arguments you’d had?

JD: Well, you know what it’s like when you’re a writer, you’re in the middle of breaking up with someone and you’re like, “Ooh, good line”. It’s like the pathetic side of being a writer, you never really stop observing, even yourself. Some of it is taken from other people but you know, in the story, it can be totally fantasy and made-up things, but I like to take the dialogue from real things.

VL: What have you got coming up next?

JD: I have The Countess, that I wrote. It’s a drama – it has nothing to do with comedy, hopefully. It’s about murder, cruelty and power and destruction. It’s very, very dark. So that’s my next film that I’m directing and starring in.

Note: Interview notes have been posted in the comments section below.

Labels: , , , ,

Interview with Rosamund Pike - April 16th, 2007

Promoting: Fracture
Venue: Dorchester Hotel
Interview type: One-on-one


ViewLondon (VL): How did you get involved with Fracture?

Rosamund Pike (RP): I’d just done Pride and Prejudice and I happened to be in L.A. so I auditioned for it and Greg (director Gregory Hoblit) really took up my cause for me with the studio. He really stuck by me and was very supportive. And I found out that I’d got it on the night we opened Pride and Prejudice in New York, so it was a fantastic night.

VL: The film’s a lot of fun and it looks fantastic, too. Was that part of the appeal?

RP: It’s just the kind of film I’ve always wanted to be in. It’s the the kind of film I love to see so I wanted to be in it. And Kramer Morgenthau is a genius cinematographer. I love it. Some people might think it’s a bit camp but I love all the shiny surfaces and the fact that you see the reflection in the blood and you see someone and then you realise it’s a mirror as he steps out and everything is reflective, you know, the floors, the walls, the glass.

VL: Gregory Hoblit has a reputation as a reliable thriller director. Had you seen any of his previous films?

RP: I’d seen Primal Fear but not Fallen. But it’s the kind of thing he does really, really well and he’s a total law junkie. He’s a lovely, lovely man, too. He gets this sort of twisted, creepy feel to his films and he couldn’t be a nicer man. It’s funny to be fascinated by the law and yet look for films that ultimately diminish your faith in the legal system.

VL: What was it like working with Ryan Gosling? He seems like he’d be a very serious actor on set.

RP: He is serious, I mean he takes it seriously and it does it quite alone, but by the end he trusted me and we got to work together. But that’s the thing, it’s so frustrating – you finally get into a rapport and you’re really creating something and then it has to end. But he had some fun with it too. We did this love scene that ended up being cut and he said, “Come on, Rosamund, we have to get down, we have to get sweaty” and I said, “Oh, I don’t think I’m going to get sweaty” and he goes, “No, no, with me, you have to get sweaty, come on, down, press-ups”. And I wasn’t going to be outdone by this bloke so we got down to do press-ups and it was very embarrassing, because by about three I was done and sort of falling on the floor. So then I realised that Evian spray is the way forward. You get just as sweaty and hopefully more elegantly so.

VL: Thanks very much, I’ll bear that in mind.

RP: (Laughs) Yes. If you want to ever go for the sweaty look, Evian spray is the way to go.

Note: I've posted notes for the interview in the comments section below.

Labels: , ,

Saturday, August 21, 2010

Interview with Emma de Caunes - March 7th, 2007

Promoting: Mr Bean's Holiday
Venue: St Martin's Lane Hotel
Interview type: One-on-one


Question (Q): Who do you play in the film?

Emma de Caunes (EdC): I play Sabine (Bean, Sabine, you see?). I become his friend because I drive a Mini, like his Mini in London, the same, so he is astonished by my Mini. His only goal is to see the beach in Cannes and I play an actress who is just starting out, she’s doing commercials and she has a small part in a movie in Cannes so she gives him a lift with the Mini and then the adventure starts.

Q: So there’s no romance?

EdC: You can’t talk about romance really with Mr Bean, you know? He’s such a child trapped in an adult body but he’s not really comfortable with love. It’s more about friendship.

Q: Were you aware of Mr Bean before you signed on to the movie?

EdC: Of course, of course. I’ve been a big fan for a long time. As you know, maybe, my dad (Antoine de Caunes) did a TV show here and he so when I was younger he brought back tapes of Mr Bean and I liked it a lot.

Q: What was it like working with Rowan? I hope he didn’t spend the whole time in character?

EdC: Um, he was really concentrating the whole time and I really understand that, it’s so difficult and I was so amazed by his work. It has nothing to do with normal acting, it’s physical, his body is his real instrument. And also, with this kind of comedy, it’s all about rhythm, you have to catch the perfect rhythm because the joke won’t work if it’s one second too late or too early.

Q: Does he come to the set as Mr Bean or does he come to the set in the clothes and switch on the character when the cameras roll?

A: Oh, no, he’s Rowan Atkinson and then action! And then suddenly…it’s amazing to see the way he splits the two. I guess he’s had Mr Bean in him for a long time and he knows him perfectly. Sometimes he was improvising and it was hard for me not to laugh.

Q: In the paper today there was a picture of Rowan promoting the film on a beach in Sydney and you’re here in London. Does that seem fair to you?

EdC: (Laughs) Yeah, that’s not fair! I want to go to Sydney too.

Note: I've posted notes on further questions that didn't make the published version of the interview in the comments section below.

Labels: , , , ,

Interview with Amelia Warner and Ringan Ledwidge (star and director of Gone) - February 27th, 2007

Promoting: Gone
Venue: Soho House
Interview type (one-on-two)


Question(Q): Where did the idea come from? Was it based on any of your own nightmare backpacking experiences?

Ringan Ledwidge (RL): Well, the script was something that Working Title brought to me, so it didn’t originate with me, but funnily enough, I have had a slightly sort of obsessive American lock onto me when I’ve been travelling before and had to leave under cover of darkness one morning to shake him, only to bump into him again two months later with another group that he’d locked onto. So, yeah, I know those guys that you just cannot get rid of and part of that fed into the script.

Amelia Warner (AW): I haven’t actually had any back-packing experiences, I need to get out there and do it. I kind of missed the gap where all my friends kind of did it. I’m going to try and do it soon, so maybe I’ll get some horrible stories then.

Q: How did you get involved in the film?

AW: I just read the script and liked it and went in and auditioned. Several times.

RL: Ha ha! Poor Amelia. I did have her sort of coming back and repeatedly doing the rather more extreme moments in the film, round the table, pretending the room was the Outback.

Q: The film’s a fairly intensive three-hander, was that at all reflected in terms of your off-screen relationships with Shaun and Scott?

AW: Yeah, I think it was, in that Shaun and I rehearsed with Ringan in London before we went out there. We had two weeks of unconventional rehearsals, you know, going to art galleries, sitting in a park, swapping music, that sort of thing. So when we went out to Australia there was definitely a friendship there already and I think Scott deliberately kept his distance a bit. Also, being English, there’s all that weird kind of stuff, so that definitely played in real life, I mean that was just our dynamic. Obviously there was the occasional moment of tension because it was just the three of us and it was so claustrophobic at times.

[At this point a mouse runs out from behind the skirting board in Soho House]

AW: MOUSE!

RL: That’s odd. This is really high up for a mouse.

AW: That’s so weird. I have mice in my flat and I swear they’re following me around London.

Q: What are your next projects?

AW: I’m working on something called The Dark is Rising in Romania. It’s a series of books about a little boy in an English town who gets magical powers. It’s directed by David Cunningham and co-stars Christopher Eccleston and Ian McShane and, er, some kids.

RL: I’ve just finished a screenplay about a guy in a tollbooth and this vast accident happens right in front of him and brings a new person into his life. So hopefully that’s what I’ll be moving onto next year.

Note: I've posted several notes for this interview in the comments section below. They're basically questions that I didn't end up typing out for the interview.

Labels: , , , ,

Sunday, July 25, 2010

Interview with 24 stars Gregory Itzin and Jean Smart (President Logan and Martha Logan) - October 18th, 2006

Promoting: 24, season 5
Venue: Covent Garden Hotel
Interview type: One-on-one (well, one-on-two)



ViewLondon: First of all, congratulations on the show. Are you both on board for season six?

Gregory Itzin (GI): We’re not allowed to say! Here’s what we say because we’ve said it before. We’ve been told we are…and there you go.

Jean Smart (JS): Apparently almost two years will have taken place between Day 5 and Day 6, so they’re going to fit us in where they can.

VL: And is the movie going to be after Season 6 or before Season 6?

GI: They’re writing it now and that’s all they’ll tell us. There are no guarantees, or rather there’s only one guarantee and we know who that is. And we don’t know what it’s about or anything else. I even know the people who are writing it and they just don’t even talk about it.

VL: That must be very frustrating. Is it?

JS: I never assumed that I’d have anything to do with the movie, so it’s not frustrating to me at all!

GI: Everyone says ‘Oh, you’re going to be in the movie’, I say no. No assumptions are made on this show.

JS: I don’t think anybody who’s on the show is assuming they’re going to be in the movie.

GI: But the fact that we’re alive, it’s good.

JS: We’re still breathing.

VL: One of the great things about 24 is its propensity for killing off its main characters. Were you scared you weren’t going to make it to the end?

GI: Not scared. I thought it could happen. I’ll tell you honestly - business-wise, I knew if they did, they’d still pay me till the end of the season so it wasn’t that big a deal. And I figured if they did, they’d find a way to do it that was interesting but basically I knew they couldn’t kill two Presidents in one day. I thought that would be a bit much.

JS: Right. And a First Lady.

GI: Well, I didn’t know that you would go. I thought you’d be the one that would kill me.

JS: Yeah, we thought he’d kill me or I’d kill him or we’d kill each other or something but I said, you know, if she goes, I just want it to be in an interesting way. Heroic or taking a lot of people with her or something.

GI: You got to kill somebody!

JS: I did. My son was very impressed with that. Although he thought I was too upset. He said why were you so upset when you shot that day?

GI: Because she’s not Jack Bauer, that’s why.

VL: How far in advance do you get the scripts?

GI: A week or two. But if you’re going to die, they bring you in and talk to you.

JS: They give you a little courtesy call if you’re going to die.

VL: Gregory, what was your reaction to finding out Logan was behind everything?

GI: At first I was very, ‘What? What? No! Wait! Stop!’ because while I realised that they and I together were creating a character who was indecisive and ill-equipped for the job, let’s face it, ultimately, I always thought of him as – in his own head he’s a hero. And even afterwards he was. But when I first heard that he was, or might have been or whatever – you see, even now, I’m resisting it – the prime mover behind David Palmer’s death, even if it wasn’t intentional, I said I can’t, no, wait, stop. But ultimately I trusted them, because they have a hit show and they know what they’re doing. And interestingly enough, once he did this, he became more popular, people liked him more. And I think, simply, it’s because he finally became decisive and people like their villains to be clear-cut or something like that. But at first I said no, I don’t like this and I had to step back out of it, go back and look at some episodes, right around episode 6,7 and 8, when I’m reacting to Cummings and saying, ‘You’re a traitor’ and all of that, I mean, when I acted that stuff I didn’t know all that other stuff was coming, so when I acted that stuff it’s really honest and it’s really coming from a real place and then I started to think, well, this becomes even more interesting now, because he’s such a good actor in these moments and he’s using his anger at Cummings for being caught. So then it became quite appropriate and I could walk back into the character and go, okay. But at first, I was not very happy at all.

VL: Are we going to see more of Martha and Agent Aaron Pierce?

JS: Everybody’s asked me that, they all ask me why he didn’t kiss her. You know, her husband tried to kill her and this guy saved her life – it tends to colour the way a woman looks at a guy.

VL: Did you play it like she was attracted to him?

JS: They told me that they might sort of go in that direction and I wasn’t sure at first. But it was very sweet, the way they handled it, because he was the kind of person who would never step beyond what he considered his duty and his proper position. They actually cut a scene though that he and I were very upset about. There was a scene where he said something which let her know how he felt, which was quite shocking to her. And they cut that. So then the scene they left in, where he comes to my room and I thank him for saving my life and hold his hand and everything, that came out of what he’d said to me but now it looked like I was sexually harassing the staff! I thought Oh my God, this is terrible! But it was okay, people didn’t seem to mind.

VL: Had you watched the show before you were cast?

GI: I had sampled it a couple of times because there was a big to-do about the show, so I watched it a couple of times, but it was appointment TV and you had to watch from the beginning, so I didn’t. But when they hired me, I said, could I please have the DVDs for what’s happened up to now and then I got it.

JS: I had not seen the show so they sent me season 4 and I just was blown away by it. And my son and I sat and watched it in a couple of days and my husband got on board very soon after and we became a house of junkies for this show.

VL: Do you have a favourite moment from this season?

GI: The scene in the last episode when she and I are in the hangar.

JS: I agree, the finale between Greg and I. But also my first scene, the introduction to Martha where she dumps her head in the sink. It spoke volumes about her impulsive nature and it’s one of my favourite introductions to any character I’ve ever played.

VL: What’s the atmosphere like on set, when you’re shooting?

GI: It’s amazing. The cast is obviously tremendous and honest. The work is the kind of work I like to do, when people work right. They do their homework, they come in, they engage you moment to moment, there’s no line that isn’t owned and committed to, that’s fantastic. The directors are very supportive and not directorial. The crew are the best crew I’ve ever worked with. They’re so respectful and – I hate to say this because, you know, but it’s not a cliché because it doesn’t exist on every set, but there’s a lot of love on the set. And everybody’s very proud of the work.

VL: Is Kiefer around when you’re shooting your scenes, given his executive producer position?

GI: Only when you’re on the phone with him. But I remember, on season 4, he set the tone on this from the very first season. If you’re doing a phone scene – and there are so many phone scenes on 24 – you get called in and you sit on the set while they’re talking to you on the phone. You sit in the corner and actually have a conversation with them. And that’s very rare.

VL: One more question, a slightly delicate one. There’s a moment towards the end of the series where your love scene appears to only last the length of the commercial break…

JS: The Presidential quickie? I had a huge concern about that. I said I did not want this to be like a joke on the internet or something. And they said no, no, we fudge the times on things a lot.

GI: It’s one of the few times where they weren’t quite on the up and up. There was more to the scene than ended up on the screen. That episode ran 17 minutes long and they had to lose things to fit it all in. There was a whole bunch of stuff that was left on the cutting room floor.

JS: But yeah, it was a concern. I said, you know, they’ve been married for 20 years, they know exactly what they’re doing. When you’re married that long, you know, it’s possible! It isn’t probable, but it’s possible.

GI: I had a helicopter to catch! But no, it was slightly embarrassing, but I can handle it, I’m an actor.



Note: This is a much longer version than first appeared on ViewLondon, but there's also quite a bit more that I didn't transcribe in the first place, including some stuff about Edgar (Deadgar) and Tony and some stuff about the limosine scene. If enough people want me to transcribe it, I'll dig out the tape and do the rest.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Interview with David Thewlis - March 17th, 2006

Promoting: Basic Instinct 2
Venue: The Dorchester Hotel
Interview type: One-on-one



ViewLondon (VL): How did you get involved with Basic Instinct 2?

David Thewlis (DT: Oh, just in the normal way, my agent sent me a script, you know? There’s no story, apart from I hadn’t seen the original – I’d heard about it, obviously, but I didn’t really know what it was, apart from the fact that it was a bit sexy and Sharon Stone was in it. And, you know, that was enough for me. So I read the script, and they told me it would be set in England, which was a good idea, because if you’re going to do a sequel you might as well make it quite dramatically different, I think. And I really liked Michael Caton-Jones, I’d nearly worked with him on Rob Roy and wished I had. And David Morrissey, who I’d also never worked with but really liked.

VL: How about Sharon Stone?

DT: She was fine – I didn’t really get to know her, because I only had one scene with her. Also, I shot my scenes in quite a short space of time, because I had to get shut out because we were having a baby.

VL: I have to ask, why does your character have a Welsh accent?

DL: I seem to get asked this a lot, for some reason. The Welsh accent, well, it came about in rehearsal, because the detective’s dialogue is quite banal –you know, “Where were you on the night of the murder?” - and it all sounded very flat, and I thought, “What’s a really nice lyrical accent where I can actually put the stress on things in a more entertaining way and actually entertain myself?” And I started doing that and the director liked it, he said, “That’s good, why are you doing that?” and I said, “I don’t know, I know a lot of Welsh people and I quite like it.” And I kept going back to it in rehearsal and I said, “I think I’m going to do it like that” and Michael went, “Yeah, do it” and that was that. So there’s no real backstory – basically, I was having a laugh.

Labels: , , ,

Interview with David Morrissey - March 14th, 2006

Promoting: Basic Instinct 2
Venue: The Dorchester Hotel
Interview type: One-on-one



ViewLondon (VL): How did you get involved with Basic Instinct 2? Were you a fan of the original film?

David Morrissey (DM): I was in London and I got a phone call from my agent to say that they were interested in me for Basic Instinct 2. I remembered really enjoying the first one although I hadn’t seen it for ages. I read the script, which I really liked – it was set in New York when I read it but I knew that they were going to transpose it to London. And I got the first one out again and I really thought it was great, seeing it a second time, it had a real Hitchcockian feel to it. And I met Michael Caton-Jones and we got on immediately, and the next thing they fly me to L.A. and I meet Sharon and I get to stay in the Four Seasons Hotel and I’m all very swanky and then I go down and I meet her and we get on. I’d prepared three scenes to do with her and they’d blocked out an hour for me to be with her and I was there for two hours and about an hour and a half of that was just chatting, so we got on well. And then we did the scenes and then I went home and they told me I’d got it. But in my pessimistic way I thought “This’ll never happen”, but it did.

VL: A couple of explicit deleted scenes from the film have ended up on the internet. Can you explain why they were cut out?

DM: I can’t really answer the question about why they were cut out because I wasn’t privy to those decisions, really. Probably because my arse wasn’t good enough. But I think one of the things about the time that’s gone on between the two films is that we do live in a different time, and not that it’s a more prurient time but I think that with the internet and advertising, sex is pretty much out there and available to us in a way that it wasn’t with the first film. So the first film was quite full on but now I think less is more and that might have been behind the decision to pull the threesome scene. But there’s also that maxim, that I think is very true, that you set out to make one film, you actually shoot a second film and you edit a third.

VL: Have you ever been cut out of anything?

DM: Yeah, I was cut out of Girl With A Pearl Earring, which was fine, actually, I mean I was really, well, not happy about it, but as a director you can see why those decisions were made and you don’t take it personally. And I liked the film and I think it benefited from me not being in it!

Labels: , , ,

Interview with Anjelica Huston - March 9th, 2006

Promoting: These Foolish Things
Venue: Claridges Hotel
Interview type: Round table


Q: Terence Stamp seemed to be enjoying himself immensely in the film. What was it like working with him?

Angelica Huston (AH): It was great. He's an extremely surprising actor, not that he'll throw you a curve ball but he will give you a completely novel reading of something. 'Puce' might not seem such a devastatingly funny word in print, but the way he delivers it genuinely cracks you up. You can't help it. He just goes about his business as though no-one else is there, really. In the first scene as innocuous a phrase as 'Do you want a prawn?' becomes incredibly funny. I don't know how he manages to do this but his delivery is brilliant and dry and his wit is great.

Q: Was the relationship between your characters on the page or was it your idea?

AH: I think we kind of developed our screen romance a bit, it became a good idea. I don't think it was quite so obvious on the page, but I took advantage of the situation.

Q: You and (co-star) Lauren Bacall go way back, don’t you?

AH: We've been friends for a very long time. Years ago, the moment I fell in love with Lauren Bacall was when we were having dinner at my father's rented house in Rhode Island. One night, he started telling stories, and Bacall was at the bottom of the table. He started talking about Katie Hepburn, how wonderful she was, how she was a man's woman, maybe she was the best female friend he ever had - and finally, down at the end of the table this little voice said, 'But John, what about me?'. He said, 'Oh honey, you were married to Bogie, you don't count!'. She looked at him like a little bird. At the same time, she can terrify people. I think that's what makes her a great actress. She's capable of going to all sides, through all the facets. That's what we're all made up of a little bit. Give us some good lines, we come in like gangbusters, the rest of the time we're wracked with self-doubt.

Labels: , , ,

Interview with Lindy Booth - January 12th, 2006

Promoting: Cry_Wolf
Venue: MyHotel, Bloomsbury.



ViewLondon (VL): How did you get involved with the film?

Lindy Booth (LB): I got sent the script by my manager and I read it and I loved it. It’s a fabulous script, it’s extremely well written and my character, Dodger, is a really strong female character. I read a lot of horror scripts and to not play a victim, to play someone who’s really layered and an interesting person is really rare. So I sent an audition tape and I came down from Toronto to audition and I guess (director) Jeff was in the middle of his search and basically, I got the part.

VL: Without giving away any specifics about the plot, how do you feel about twist endings?

LB: I hate twist endings. I truly do. Because I hate watching a movie and the end comes and you’re like, “Why did I watch the whole movie? I could have just watched the last ten minutes.” But I think that what’s great about this is it’s not a twist. You know from the beginning what you’re getting into. I feel like it’s so supported, so it’s not a twist.

VL: Because the film is basically about lying?

LB: Exactly. It’s about lying and it’s about subjectivity. Because the whole film, you’re trying to figure out who’s lying and who’s telling the truth. And you’re trying to figure out, are we manipulating you? Are we being honest with you? Are we being honest with what we’re showing you? And I think that’s where it comes from and I think it’s really exciting because at the end you’re like, “Ah HAH!” You know? You’re fulfilled – it all works out.

Labels: , , ,

Interview with Ryan Reynolds - January 6th, 2006

Promoting: Just Friends
Venue: The Soho Hotel (I think)



ViewLondon(VL): How did you get involved in the movie?

Ryan Reynolds (RR): It was something that (director) Roger Kumble brought to me, plus I just loved that whole concept of “You can’t go home again.” That’s something that I can definitely relate to. I’ve tried to go home numerous times and it’s not easy, so I loved that concept. I was shocked that no-one else had jumped on that idea yet – the whole Friend Zone thing.

VL: Can you describe the Fat Suit experience? How was it for you?

RR: It was fun. I liked that the Fat Suit wasn’t so over the top, it wasn’t gigantic or anything. It was integral to shaping that character. It was a five hour experience to get it on – there was a team of people working on it around the clock and I felt like they would have to put scaffolding on me to get it on. But it’s weird – any time you have a kind of appliance on your face, it suddenly avails you of about 20 new facial expressions so I was loving that. I was loving just experimenting with it, playing in the mirror.

VL: There are several hilarious supporting performances in the film, particularly Chris Marquette, who plays your brother.

RR: He’s great, yeah. My brother in real life – he and I had that dynamic. And Roger rather trepidatiously let us do this, like, slap fight stuff. I mean that went on in my house – I had three older brothers. And in the movie, every slap is real. I mean, we didn’t pull any punches. So by the time we finished shooting our faces looked like some sort of diseased pancake. It was really violent. But I just love when something like that happens – it looks so out of place for this romantic comedy to have this, like, hardcore violence, but for some reason it just cracked me up.

VL: I thought at the time that it was great “slap acting” but obviously you’re prepared to suffer for your art.

RR: Oh yeah, it was all absolutely real.

Labels: , , ,

Monday, June 14, 2010

Blimey. It still exists.

Oh good. I looked for this a while back and it wasn't there. I am intending to use this blog to post up unedited versions of all the interviews I've done for ViewLondon and others. It won't be for a while because I'm in Edinburgh for the Edinburgh Film Festival for the next two weeks, but it's high on the list of Things To Do when I get back.